What is the principal
purpose of this documentary?
The principal purpose of this documentary is to show the
impacts, nature, evolution and possible future of the business corporation.
What does the film
critique? How do you know that?
The film critiques the different aspects of the business
corporation; it does this through breaking down these different aspects. It
separates the aspects of corporations into different sections, some including Democracy Ltd, Hostile Take Over, and Unsettling Accounts. In Unsettling Accounts, the film talks
about the company Monsanto and the effect of its bovine growth hormone. This is
just one of the many examples of what they show within the divided sections.
The film also critiques the many things that are wrong in the corporation world
and how harmful corporations actually are in a number of ways. There is a
section where they actually go through the many different ways corporations can
harm people, animal, the environment, etc. They flip through these ways and
then stop on one and explain it a bit more, for example child labour as a form
of harm against humans or drug testing as a form of harm against animals.
What methods did the
filmmaker use to increase public awareness about corporate responsibility and
affect people’s beliefs and behaviour?
One of the main things the filmmaker does to increase public
awareness about corporate responsibility is give what the speakers were saying
a sort of familiarity. They matched some of the stuff the speakers were saying
with video clips, some more popular than others. What this did was gave viewers
a better understanding of what message the filmmakers were trying get across.
They did this when talking about the Monsanto controversy with their bovine
growth hormone. They were talking about how two reporters were being paid to
keep their mouths shut about what was going on as well as having their report
about Monsanto rewritten. The reporters were instead being told by the company what
to write in their report and as the reporters are talking about this the filmmakers
show hands typing on a keyboard and then showing a finger pressing the “control”
button. Here the filmmaker subtly shows how corporations were trying to control
others in order protect themselves. That instead of taking responsibility for
the negative effects of their product, Monsanto did all it could to “control”
the situation and to have a certain power over others in order to have a clean
record.
Which methods of
theirs did you think were most effective in supporting their position on
corporate responsibility? Why?
One of the most effective ways the filmmaker shows his
position on corporate responsibility is when comparisons are being made, the
actions of those who are against corporations and those who run corporations.
The film went back and forth between showing different clips of the two. It
showed activists standing up for what they believe in and being beaten and
trying to be contained by police because things were getting out of hand; the
streets are both a mess and chaotic. It then flips to scenes of the people who
run these corporations. These scenes are completely opposite to what is going
on outside, it’s as if they don’t even care about the effect their corporation is
having on society. This was an effective method because these scenes truly show
how corporations aren't taking responsibility for their actions. It shows that
they are oblivious to anything that doesn't benefit them and simply don’t care if
they harm anyone else. Corporation
owners are inside living the good life while others are dealing with the
repercussions of these same companies.
Did you have any
issues with this documentary? What were some parts that you did not agree with,
or question? Why?
I didn't really have any issues with this documentary. I
thought it was a good representation of what corporations are and what they
stand for. It explained its point of view well and went into great detail in order to explain where they stand on corporate responsibility. It gave lots of example, which I enjoy when learning about something new and it's visuals (the certain pictures and different video clips) were very helpful when trying to when trying to explain an intricate point or idea about corporations.
Describe another film
you have watched that has an impact on your values. How and why did that
happen?
A film that had an impact on me was Bill Maher’s Religulous. It was basically a film
exploring religion from a satirical point of view. I think it had an impact
because it was produced in a way that related to me. It was able to convey its
point of view through its sarcasm and wit as well as the certain interviews
Bill Maher conducted. It is through these things that Religulous made an impact on my belief system. When something is familiar or has some sort of connection to you to makes it easier learn something.
No comments:
Post a Comment